|
MISCELLANEOUS
• Bioterrorism and infectious animal diseases.
• Controlling new and emerging pig diseases.
• A world of new diseases.
• Cost of production.
• Swine production.
• Metamorphosis underway in Mexico.
• Europe counts its sows.
• La productivité des truies est-elle un critère
important? (Sow productivity: an important criterium?).
• Relations entre réactions comportamentales et
productivité chez la truie. Etude et validation d’un test dans
24 élevages naisseurs-engraisseurs hors-sol (Relationships between
the behavioral response and productivity of sows. Study and
validation of a test in 24 farrow-to-finish French herds).
• Understanding and managing seasonal infertility.
• How to correctly diagnose the causes of reproductive
failures.
• Development of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination
of porcine haptoglobin in various body fluids: testing the significance of meat
juice measurements for quality monitoring programs.
• Abattage des porcs et qualités des carcasses et viandes
(pig slaughtering and meat and carcass quality).
• The understanding of gene markers.
• Four-year study of lameness in piglets at a research station.
• Monitoring herds: serological variability, accuracy and reliability.
Bioterrorism
and infectious animal diseases.
CHARREYRE C
Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,
2003, volume 26, 431-443
Which pathogens could be used
by bioterrorists and to what extent are they a risk for animal
health and production and human health? The authors address
this issue giving a description of the main candidate pathogens,
analyzing which could be the consequences of an epidemic
and reporting the few measures of prevention available. Some
glances at history make this paper all the more interesting.
Controlling
new and emerging pig diseases.
DONE SH
International Pig Topics, 2003, Volume 18, N°8, 7-10
Why and how new viral diseases
are emerging in pigs and how can these pathogens be controlled?
The pathogen-host-environment triangle undergoes a continuous
evolution which opens the gate to new diseases. Influenza
viruses are a typical example of how a pathogen can evolve,
genetic improvement modifies the host the pathogen deals
with and new management practices changes the environment
the host lives in. Moreover, the continuous expansion of
both the human and domestic animal populations into the areas
of wilderness brings about the emergence of previously locally
contained pathogens. In any case, it is essential not to
overlook any finding even though practical benefit might
not be immediately foreseen: all information available on
the non-pathogenic PCV1 were indeed very useful when PCV2
made its entrance. In spite of all regulations and available
tools swine herds remain vulnerable and the recent outbreaks
of foot-and-mouth disease and classical swine fever in the
United Kingdom clearly illustrate it. In each case, when
dealing with a disease, finding a good economical cost/benefit
balance is the overriding factor to consider. To do so, the
author underlines the key role of diagnostic laboratories
and the importance of always developing diagnostic tests,
prophylactic means and therapeutic tools.
A
world of new diseases.
DONE S
Pig International, 2003, Volume 33, N°8, 27-30
The emergence of new diseases
affecting pigs has been going on without a respite for the
last decade and will probably not soften. Several causes
such as climate warming and nutritional factors (antioxidants,
mycotoxins) are mentioned. Previously “present but
silent” pathogens have turned to significant issues
(PMWS), showing that the balance between host and pathogens
has changed. Other pathogens, such as swine influenza virus,
can rapidly recombine, evolve and change host, continent
or country. In addition, swine seem to play a pivotal role
of “mixing vessel” between wildlife, domestic
poultry, wildfowl and also humans. The multifactorial aspect
of these new diseases makes them even more difficult to control.
The example of PCV2 and PMWS is particularly eloquent, even
if all PMWS-affected pigs are PCV2-positive, concomitant
infections with PPV or PRRSV have been shown to clearly have
a negative impact on the disease’s development. Problems
also emerge from PRRSV strains. They have been identified
as American or European strains, but such a geographical
distribution does not seem to be strictly valid anymore and
is further complicated by the circulation of vaccinal strains.
The challenge of swine professionals is to keep pace with
emerging diseases trying to identify the causative agents
in order to better control them.
Cost
of production.
MALAKOWSKY S
Allen D. Leman Swine Conference 2003: 154-155
The author considers as essential for producers to
know exactly what their cost of production is in order to understand where they
stand within the industry and be able to make informed decisions on their operation.
Several tables of benchmarks are included.
Swine
production.
PLAIN RL, LAWRENCE JD
Vet. Clin. Food Anim., 2003, Volume 19, 319-337
This paper reviews the evolution of swine production
in the US in the last decades and confirms the inevitable move towards new
production systems and new technology with a decline of the number of pig producers,
a shift to large hog operations and a strong trend of producers to sign marketing
contracts with packers.
Metamorphosis
underway in Mexico.
Pig progress, 2003, volume 19, n°2
The Mexican pork industry is changing with a trend
towards a major concentration of pig farms (58% of the total production is
concentrated in four states), with larger and more vertically integrated pork
operations that cover the entire swine cycle, feed production, marketing and
distribution. This evolution takes place to the detriment of smaller operations
which have to deal with major feed costs due to the use commercial feed instead
of manufacturing their own. A 11% increase of the national pig meat production
was observed in 2001 when compared to 2000.
Europe
counts its sows.
Pig International, 2003, Volume 33, N°7, 43-44
| European Union on-farm pig populations
(x1000 pigs) in December 2002 and percentage change from
December 2001 |
| Country |
Total pigs |
% |
Sows |
% |
| Germany |
26172 |
+0.8 |
2527 |
+0.2 |
| Spain |
23112 |
-2.2 |
2553 |
-0.2 |
| France |
15271 |
-0.4 |
1361 |
+1.0 |
| Denmark |
12879 |
-0.7 |
1375 |
+2.0 |
| Netherlands |
11154 |
-3.1 |
1140 |
-1.8 |
| Italy |
9166 |
+9.0 |
751 |
+3.0 |
| Belgium/Lux. |
6676 |
-2.6 |
675 |
-0.9 |
| UK |
5330 |
-6.3 |
586 |
-3.9 |
| Austria |
3305 |
-3.9 |
332 |
-2.3 |
| Portugal |
2300 |
-3.7 |
312 |
-3.5 |
| Sweden |
1989 |
+3.6 |
215 |
+0.3 |
| Ireland |
1782 |
+1.1 |
183 |
-2.1 |
| Finland |
1423 |
-2.1 |
185 |
+1.8 |
| Greece |
903 |
+4.9 |
156 |
+14.7 |
| Countries with decreased sow number and
percentage change since 1992 |
| UK |
-34% |
| Netherlands |
-27.6% |
| Germany |
-15.5% |
| Portugal |
-11.9% |
| Belgium/Luxembourg |
-11.3% |
| Austria |
-7.8% |
| Sweden |
-7.7% |
| Countries with increased sow number and
percentage change since 1992 |
| Finland |
+31.2% |
| Spain |
+21.6% |
| Denmark |
+19.7% |
| Italy |
+8.7% |
| France |
+7.4% |
| Ireland |
+6.4% |
| Greece |
+4.7% |
La
productivité des truies est-elle un critère
important? (Sow productivity: an important criterium?).
BADOUARD B
Porc Magazine 2003 avril: 62-64
The profit generated by
a swine operation is determined by the difference between
the sale price and the production cost per kilogram
of carcass. By increasing the number of pigs produced
per sow per year (productivity), a herd manager reduces
the production costs. A recent survey carried out in
300 French herds shows that the mean production cost
is 1.363€/kg (corresponding to a productivity
of 19.6 piglets/sow/year and a basic cost of 0.401€/kg)
while the mean sale price was 1.274€/kg. Only
25% of the herds included in this study has achieved
a production cost inferior to the mean sale price.
Achieving high technical performance is considered
here as the only actual means for an already settled
swine producer to reduce his production costs. An example
of relationship between productivity and production
costs is included: a herd with a productivity of 17.1
piglets/sow/year reaches a basic cost of 0.459€/kg
while a herd with a productivity of 22.1 piglets/sow/year
reaches a basic cost of 0.355€/kg with a clear
impact on overall production costs.
Relations
entre réactions comportamentales et productivité chez
la truie. Etude et validation d’un test dans 24 élevages
naisseurs-engraisseurs hors-sol (Relationships
between the behavioral response and productivity of sows.
Study
and validation of a test in 24 farrow-to-finish French
herds).
LENEVEU P, FABLET C, ROBERT F, POMMIER P, JOSSO JP
Revue Méd. Vét., 2003, Volume154, N°7, 469-476
This study was based on a simple test which consists
in moving the hand near to the snout of a sow and observing its reaction. Sows
that did not try to avoid contact were considered as confident. An average
level of fear of humans was determined for each herd. The higher the level
of fear is, the lower is the number of weaned piglets per sow per year and
the longer is the fecondant mating weaning interval. The automation of feeding
has obviously led stockpersons to be less present within the herd and has led
sows to associate humans only to rather negative events (vaccination, handling).
This study shows that the human-animal relationship is not to be overlooked
and significantly influences reproductive performance.
Understanding
and managing seasonal infertility.
KIRKWOOD R
Allen D. Leman Swine Conference 2003: 164-168
Delayed puberty, prolonged
wean-to-estrus intervals and reduction in farrowing
rates are the main manifestations of seasonal infertility
which primarily affects primiparous sows. Some management
practices such as early weaning, improved nutritional
quality diet and appropriate boar contact reduce the
impact of seasonal infertility. An inadequate nutrient
intake during lactation induces several variations
in the endocrine system linked to insulin, GH, cortisol
and glucagon which globally result in an inappropriate
metabolic status for fertility and pregnancy. Care
should also be taken to meet the increased energy requirement
due to lower temperatures. The importance of the PGE:PGF
ratio is also addressed as well as the role of LH in
the maintaining of pregnancy and in the helping of
ovarian recovery during lactation. Several strategies
are proposed to limit seasonal infertility and consist
in increasing lactation nutrient intake, reducing the
litter size of young sows through cross-fostering,
other approaches are injections of gonadotropins or
GnRH at breeding in primiparous sows.
How
to correctly diagnose the causes of reproductive failures.
KNUDSEN N
Swine practitioners, 2003, July/August
This paper is based on the presentation made by
Michael Yaeger and Kent Schwartz at the Iowa Veterinary Medical Association
Winter Conference and relative to cases of reproductive failures in swine.
The first approach to reproductive failures is to determine whether the cause
is infectious or noninfectious. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
virus (PRRSV) accounted for 87% of all infectious causes of abortion submitted
to the Iowa State University, leaving only a small percentage to bacterial
agents (7%). However, abortions due to bacteria were in most cases isolated
animals within the herd and less than 1% of the cases due to bacteria were
herd-wide problems. The best diagnostic approach consists in combining diagnostic
testing and review of the herd records to have a comprehensive understanding
of the situation. In noninfectious reproductive failures, it is necessary to
determine whether the problem comes from conception failure or pregnancy failure
in order to implement the more suitable protocol. Nutrition and sow condition
were pointed out by the authors as the two major factors affecting return to
estrus, conception rates and litter size. On the other hand, mycotoxins in
the feed are clearly considered as having no blame in reproductive failures.
Development
of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of porcine
haptoglobin in various body fluids: testing the significance
of meat juice measurements for quality monitoring programs.
HISS S, KNURA-DESZCZKA S, REGULA G, HENNIES M, GYMNICH S, PETERSEN B, SAUERWEIN
H
Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 2003, Volume 96, 73-82
The enzyme immunoassay which development is reported
in this paper allows the determination of porcine haptoglobin (Hp), an acute
phase protein (APP), in meat juice and represents therefore a useful tool to
assess the health status of an animal and meat quality at slaughter.
Abattage
des porcs et qualités des carcasses et viandes
(pig slaughtering and meat and carcass quality).
MONIN G
INRA Prod. Anim., 2003, Volume 16, N°4, 251-262
For pig slaughtering plants lowering the costs
has always been a key to making profit but increasing meat quality is becoming
an important challenge. Pre-slaughter operations greatly influence meat quality
and represent an interesting part of the process to work on. A more comprehensive
understanding of the effect of every single parameter is needed but stress
before slaughter should always be the main issue to address. The author reviews
the steps of the entire process (transport, housing, stunning, killing and
postmortem changes of muscles) and also underlines the influence of carcass
chilling on meat quality.
The
understanding of gene markers.
Technical team of PIC Inc
International Pig Topics, 2003, Volume 18, N°2, 7-9
What are gene markers? How can they be useful
to the swine sector? The performance of an animal greatly depends on its genome
and the identification of one or more genes of economic interest allows us,
through genetic tests, to implement beneficial selection programs. This approach
has largely been illustrated with the halothane gene which allowed to eliminate
the stress gene from the female lines. Other traits can be subjected to marker
assisted selection (MAS), such as lean production, disease resistance or litter
size. Gene markers for disease resistance have already allowed to reduce the
occurrence of edema disease caused by Escherichia coli F18 and represent a
field of great interest. However, traits with lower levels of heritability
respond to a minor extent to this approach (meat quality, reproduction). A
list of commercially available genetic tests is provided.
Four-year
study of lameness in piglets at a research station.
ZORIC M, STERN S, LUNDEHEIM N, WALLGREN P
Veterinary Record, 2003, Volume 153, 323-328
A total of 9411 liveborn piglets were included
in this study carried out at a research station in Sweden during a four-year
period. Arthritis was defined as lameness and/or visibly swollen joints and
analyzed statistically in relation to age, sex, weight at birth, parity, litter
size, health status of dam, age of iron injection and calendar month. Lameness
was diagnosed in 9.8% of the piglets. The first three weeks of life represented
the higher risk incidence of lameness which greatly decreases after weaning.
Neither significant difference in the incidence of arthritis between gilts
and barrows neither relationship with weight at birth were demonstrated. In
contrast, a significant influence of parity of sow was recorded. Experienced
dams of parity 4 had significantly lower incidence of lameness among their
piglets than gilts and younger sows. However, lameness was more frequent in
piglets born to sows of parity 8 and 9. In addition, litters with 12 or more
piglets were more affected by arthritis than those with less than 12 piglets.
The prevalence of arthritis was also higher in the coldest months of the year.
No significant relationship could be demonstrated for the other foregoing factors.
Monitoring
herds: serological variability, accuracy and reliability.
TORREMORELL M
Allen D. Leman Swine Conference 2003: 99-102
Serological tests are not and cannot be perfect
tools with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When monitoring herds one
should be aware of the limitations of the serological tests he uses and know
how to overcome them. When in doubt or when the results of a test may have
severe consequences on the herd, a strategy consists in retesting the population
with the same test or with another test that uses different physical properties.
It is also possible to increase the sample size or to change the frequency
of sampling. However, when implementing a monitoring program it is necessary
to consider the costs and to have a comprehensive understanding of how to interpret
the results. |